Reports of JUs is larger than that of HSZUs or OUs. However in 2008, 2009 and
2010, the average of Reports of central 211Us is larger than that of eastern 211Us,
and that of the eastern 211Us is larger than that of the western 211Us. Among
eastern 211Us, the average of HSZUs is larger than that of JUs or OUs.
3.4 Status and Change of Research Output Per Unit Input
in 211Us
3.4.1 Overall Status and Change of Research Output Per
Unit Input in 211Us
Through the analysis on the overall research outputs in the previous sections, we
canfind that there exist substantial differences across 211Us on SCI and TOPESI
Fig. 3.55 University average of reports by university location (HSS)
Table 3.27 Research output per unit of 211Us (NEAM)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
SCI per capita 0.23 0.25 0.27 0.31 0.34
(0.95) (0.84) (0.83) (0.75) (0.71)
SCI per¥10 million 25.62 23.96 21.95 21.13 17.34
(0.91) (0.95) (1.09) (0.93) (0.77)
TOPESI per¥10 million 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.15
(1.64) (1.43) (1.60) (1.35) (1.42)NoteCoefficient of variation in the parentheses
86 3 Overall Research Performance of 211Us...