Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics

232 a J.topol value 0.32 b Index % of times areas 1st/2nd/3rd are recovered 20 40 60 80 100 endem I I_e I_s I_se rich W W_e W_s ...

1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 25 50 75 100 ABCDEFGH I J KLMNOP Areas I_s Index % rec a Jtopol: 0.32 Jtip: 0.32 b 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 ...

234 a given ranking, the results after re-sampling would give a clue of the situation when the information is perturbed. Acknowl ...

235 Miller JA (2003) Assessing progress in systematics with continuous jackknife function analysis. Syst Biol 52(1):55–65 Patten ...

© The Author(s) 2016 237 R. Pellens, P. Grandcolas (eds.), Biodiversity Conservation and Phylogenetic Systematics, Topics in Bio ...

238 Introduction Opening wide the sampling window in biodiversity studies is a major goal today, and this leads to two major res ...

239 Assessing Hotspots of Evolutionary Distinctiveness in New Caledonia New Caledonia is a Pacifi c Ocean island located some 14 ...

240 This high level of endemism has attracted considerable scientifi c interest in the evolutionary history of the island (see t ...

241 We considered 16 areas (sites) within New Caledonia n mainland. This set of sites includes the very great majority of areas ...

242 refers to the number of species from the 18 phylogenies occurring in each area. A species was considered a microendemic if i ...

243 three species, i.e. the most ‘basal’ species from each phylogeny, assigning them a score of 1 (for most basal) 0.67 (second ...

244 Ws ranks = −1.03 + 0.259 number of phylogenies; F = 26.75; DF = 14; p = 0.000; R^2 = 0.66). Based on it, we decided to stand ...

245 Fig. 2 Summed Ws values. The main fi gure shows the values standardized (= divided) by the number of phylogenies present at ...

246 Fig. 3 Summed site scores for species on top and second ranks. The main fi gures shows the values standardized (= divided) b ...

Fig. 4 Over 80 % of the variation in the sites’ Ws sums is explained by species richness ( upper fi gure part ). There is still ...

Fig. 5 A little over 50 % of the variation in the sites’ top and second top scores is explained by species richness ( upper fi g ...

249 Values in red and bold are ‘real’ drops, i.e. the dropped phylogeny was indeed present at the site. A: ranks based on standa ...

250 Values in red and bold are ‘real’ drops, i.e. the dropped phylogeny was indeed present at the site. A: ranks based on standa ...

251 Fig. 6 Sum over all sites of absolute differences in site ranks (based on Ws sum ) if the phylogeny (x axis) is dropped. The ...

252 20 sum of absolute difference in ranks if phylog. dropped 15 10 5 0 20 sum of absolute difference in ranks if phylog. droppe ...