cdTOCtest
thus punishing a member of an identifiable group without a determination of guilt at any time. B. Laws Not Bills of Attainder Ni ...
Rather, the board simply “gives res judicata effect to the findings at the disciplinary proceedings. In re Scioscia, 216 N.J. Su ...
the mere solicitation of a bribe by or on behalf of an officer, without payment being made, did not constitute bribery. State v. ...
which did not contain the explicit definition of “benefit as consideration” which is now set forth in N.J.S.A. 2C:27-2. See I Fi ...
case in terms of explaining the defendant’s nonchalance in accepting one of the cash payments. In State v. Jenkins, 255 N.J. Sup ...
crime of the second degree. State v. Phelps, 187 N.J. Super. 364, 372-376 (App. Div. 1983), aff’d 96 N.J. 500 (1984). II. THREAT ...
L. 1999, c. 440 § 98 rewrote the section as part of a comprehensive legislative effort to strengthen the laws on public contract ...
strengthen the laws on public contracts, proscribes a public servant from transacting business with himself or a family member, ...
through a forced window and discarding a screwdriver); State v. Williams, 229 N.J. Super. 179, 181-83 (App. Div. 1988) (evading ...
explanation why he was in building and defendant’s conduct suggested criminal activity). It was not error for trial judge to def ...
of aggravated manslaughter and burglary do not merge. State v. Lewis, 223 N.J. Super. 145, 151-53 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 1 ...
CAPITAL PUNISHMENTCAPITAL PUNISHMENTCAPITAL PUNISHMENTCAPITAL PUNISHMENTCAPITAL PUNISHMENT I. CONSTITUTIONALITY A. Federal Stand ...
cannot be unconstitutionally vague. Id. at 471, 113 S.Ct. at 1541, 123 L.Ed.2d 188. At the penalty phase, the jurors must be per ...
sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case of capital murder against each defendant. State v. Simon, 161 N.J. 416, 440-4 ...
demographic characteristics of the proposed venue insofar as they may effect the likelihood of a fair trial by an impartial jury ...
113 N.J. 393, 412 and n.5 (1988). A judge must inquire into whether a juror could consider mitigating evidence if the State esta ...
In circumstances in which the aggravating factor of prior murder is not alleged, a motion for separate guilt phase and penalty p ...
III. PENALTY PHASE A. General Principles At the penalty phase, the State has the right to open and close because it bears the bu ...
mind is not offered as an aggravating factor but merely as rebuttal to defendant’s claim. State v. Davis, 116 N.J. 341, 365 (198 ...
Defendant’s state of mind must be purposeful, i.e., wanting the suffering to occur. Id. With regard to depravity of mind, the ...
«
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
»
Free download pdf