Sartre

considers is only probable, not certain, much less apodictic (as for some phenomenological accounts). Only the latter shares in ...

space, like potentiality and instrumentality, like universal time itself in the form of totalities in perpetual disintegration. ...

The future Time, insofar as it is revealed in an ekstatic temporality which temporalizes itself (that is, original temporality), ...

(“L’enfer c’est les autres”).^10 This has been taken as the epitaph on the tomb of his social philosophy. It is a common philoso ...

that I could be existing in a solipsistic “world.” Hence the relation must be one ofbeingand not simply of knowledge. Important ...

In Sartrean parlance, he is “objectifying” the pair, turning them into being-in-itself and thus “stealing” their freedom-possibi ...

self which I am without knowing it; for I discover it in shame and in other instances in pride. It is shame or pride which revea ...

that the body is the “facticity” of consciousness.^18 It is not distinct from the situation of the for-itself. Indeed, the body ...

another. Its “quality” is a function of the depth of my desire to overcome it. “Thus, the world of coefficients of adversity rev ...

ontological dimension of our bodily being-for-others. He also describes it as a form of “alienation,” not simply in the sense of ...

preserving its character as freedom (Sadism). These are relations among Others and not between a consciousness and a thing. And ...

(BN 406 ). This is interpersonal relations as a game of stare-down. In this case, the victim refused to “blink.” Sartre makes a ...

performance or the synchronized actions of our rowing team. But he considers such matters of “lateral” and nonpositional conscio ...

the “givens” of our lives – our moving beyond the factical toward the possible, beyond the essence to the future. It is with thi ...

passionate act but rather afoundationwhich is strictly contemporary with the will or the passion and whichthese manifest, each i ...

(la substantialite ́)(CDG 143 ); that is the drive to be in-itself-for-itself or what Thomas Anderson aptly calls “the God-proje ...

Still, I should mention that Sartre’s discussion of “death” distin- guished him sharply from Heidegger. If he has been distancin ...

Voicing a thesis that will be dramatized in his playNo Exitthe following year, he concludes that death “is the triumph of the po ...

Sartre reserves for the agency of the conscious subject in “concretizing” these otherwise abstract structures. Again, we encount ...

I suppose it represents for me the equivalent of conscious-unconscious, which is to say that I no longer believe in certain form ...