THE INTEGRATION OF BANKING AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS: THE NEED FOR REGULATORY REFORM

384 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY On the other hand, language is a very good system in which to conduct thought, and it serves very ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 385 Literature written about pragmatic theory^14 notes that interlocutors may arrive at work ...

386 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY In certain contexts of urgency, grounding mechanisms are part of the ritual of communication desig ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 387 with task-oriented success.^26 In the present work, transcripts of dialogues from outsid ...

388 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY pragmatic inferences may be drawn. The occurrence of such instances has led to the development of ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 389 contexts as to safety in air traffic communications: measures of conversational synchron ...

390 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY I. METHODS In all cases, the dialogues analyzed here have already been independently transcribed a ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 391 are replicable and not dependent on any particular theory of natural language syntax. (1 ...

392 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY made by that speaker. This remains a structural definition, since it is not constrained temporally ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 393 Dialogues are reordered by generating new start-times and durations for each utterance a ...

394 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY Table 2: Variables Analyzed^ Variable Interpretation DialogType actual vs. randomized OtherSpeaker ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 395 In a BBC television interview in 1997, Jeremy Paxman interviewed Michael Howard, the for ...

396 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY the actual repetition (OS,SS) a significantly greater proportion of total tokens that could have b ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 397 Table 4: 1997 Paxman-Howard interview: counts of shared and nonshared tokens by dialogue ...

398 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY Figure 2: Allo-repetition by Paxman & Howard: shared vs. nonshared tokens by speaker and n-bar ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 399 Figure 3: Self-repetition by Paxman & Howard: shared vs. nonshared tokens by speaker ...

400 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY The lack of significance in the difference between the actual and randomized dialogues in the dire ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 401 the participants, the conversation is difficult to classify as successful. It is not saf ...

402 JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY Figure 4: Allo-repetition in the Herrero case: shared vs. nonshared tokens by speaker in actual an ...

ATTRIBUTION OF MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING 403 Figure 5: Self-repetition in the Herrero case: shared vs. nonshared tokens by speaker in ...