leadership and motivation in hospitality
significant but reduced in comparison with 2:1c, then we can conclude that partial mediation of the ML→JP path by ME is supporte ...
Understanding both the direct and indirect effects in the model influences our understanding of the impact that Motivational Lea ...
H 6 (JS→JP): as employees experience greater levels of Job Satisfaction they will also experience greater levels of Job Performa ...
Examining the factor loadings reveals several below the 0.700 level – these include several that have, by now, become ‘usual sus ...
7 - 15 describes the estimates and model fit diagnostics for the second iteration of the measurement model (CFA 3:2). All factor ...
Construct Item Standardised factor loading estimates ML ME JS AOC JP DSB Motivational Leadership ML1 .904 ML2 (^) .951 ML3 .881 ...
Construct Item Standardised factor loading estimates ML ME JS AOC JP DSB Motivational Leadership ML1 .905 ML2 (^) .951 ML3 .880 ...
correlation estimates between these constructs are: ME AOC = 0.880; ME JS = 0.892; and AOC JS = 0.823). These three constr ...
new construct. Theoretical support for the new relationships (ML→EA and EA→JP) is provided by the values→attitudes→behaviour (V→ ...
Referring to Table 7 - 18 , all factor loadings and factor covariances are statistically significant although the model fit diag ...
There should always be a good theoretical rationale for linking error variances in this way^13 (Kline 2005: 318) and models that ...
Model CFA 3b:4 Model fit continues to be unsatisfactory (χ^2 p = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.71; CFI = 0.951) There are no variables fl ...
o therefore, removing either JS6 or ME1 will not impact the substantive content of the construct as the ‘satisfaction’ component ...
Construct^ Item^ Standardised factor loading estimates ML EPA JP DSB Motivational Leadership ML1 0.904 (^) ML2 0.953 (^) ML3 0.8 ...
Interpreting Employee Attitudes To interpret the content and generate an identity for the new Employee Attitudes construct, the ...
With reference to Wollack et al.’s Work Meaning model (upon which the Work Meaning construct for this research is based, see Fig ...
located. Accordingly, the new construct is interpreted as Employee Positive Attitudes (EPA)^15. The new hypotheses can now be ex ...
Figure 7-14 Parameter estimates and model fit for SEM 3b Checking the AMOS output for multivariate normality finds that the CR v ...
To determine whether or not Employee Positive Attitudes (EPA) has a partial mediation effect on the ML→JP relationship it is nec ...
The new, combined employee attitudes construct has five indicator variables JS1, AOC2, ME1, ME3 and ME6 and has been labelled as ...
«
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
»
Free download pdf