324700_Print.indd

central 211Us is in a slightlyfluctuant trend, and the western 211Us is generally in the downtrend. Inside eastern 211Us, the in ...

It’s observable from Table4.32that the redundant proportions of R&D Staff with Senior Title and R&D Grants in DEA-ineffi ...

we can observe that the redundant proportion of either 985Us or non-985Us on the indicator of R&D Staff with Senior Titlefir ...

4.2.11.2 Analysis on the Improvements of Outputs The detailed results of increasable amount and proportion for each university a ...

articles in DEA-inefficient 211Us is 39.39%. From Fig.4.26, we can observe that the increasable amount of Monographs of DEA-inef ...

CSSCI articles of DEA-inefficient 985Us and non-985Us are 4.76 and 49.42% respectively. From Fig.4.27, we can observe that the i ...

the indicator of CSSCI Articles, the increasable proportion of 985Us is in the slight downtrend, while that of non-985Us is in t ...

211Us or central 211Us in 2006–2010, and thefive-year averages of eastern, central and western 211Us are 7.54, 10.02, and 5.78 r ...

It’s observable from Table4.40that, on the indicator of CSSCI articles, the increasable proportion of DEA-inefficient western 21 ...

the area of decreasing returns to scale (DRS). In 2006–2010, thefive-year averages of TE, PTE, and SE scores are around 0.80–0.8 ...

central or western 211Us, reflecting that the between-university TE gap is much greater among eastern 211Us, but relatively smal ...

non-985Us are 15.59, 48.93, 1.04, and 1.66 respectively. Thefive-year averages of increasable proportions of SCI articles and CS ...

research inputs, or enlarging research scale. However, there is also around 40–50% of total 211Us operating in the area of IRS, ...

are−61.22 and−61.30% respectively. In 2006–2010, the two kinds of redundant proportions are generally in the downtrend. In 2006– ...

for those 211Us in eastern China, the DEA-inefficient HSZUs and OUs should increase their outputs in SSCI articles, and the JUs ...

Table 4.41 Research ef fi ciency scores of 211Us (NEAM sample in 2006) ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC 1 0.97 ...

Table 4.41 (continued) ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC 25 0.807 0.807 1 C 59 0.785 1 0.785 D 93 0.435 0.44 0. ...

Table 4.42 Research ef fi ciency scores of 211Us (NEAM sample in 2007) ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC 1 0.78 ...

Table 4.42 (continued) ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC 25 0.664 0.689 0.965 D 59 0.688 0.908 0.758 D 93 0.457 ...

Table 4.43 Research ef fi ciency scores of 211Us (NEAM sample in 2008) ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC ID TE PTE SE RTC 1 0.86 ...